CHAPTER 4

Segregation of traffic on the movement area

 

4.1 need for traffic segregation

4.1.1 The potential for aircraft and ground vehicle interactions exists on the runways, taxiways and aprons that make up the aircraft movement area. The number of interactions can be minimized, however, in the planning phase of the aerodrome facility by segregating the air and ground traffic. Properly segregated traffic will minimize the possibility of aircraft and ground vehicle collisions and maximize the efficiency of aircraft movements. Those interactions that are necessary should be planned for predominated areas using established procedures.

4.1.2 There is a need for some ground vehicles to operate on the movement area for the purposes of aircraft servicing, aerodrome maintenance and construction work, and emergency operations. However, because of the different physical character­istics of aerodromes, no specific design criteria can be established to promote segregation of traffic. There are, however, a number of measures that may be taken to lessen the amount of mixing of aircraft and ground vehicles.

 

4.2 Activities Causing A Mix Of Aircraft And Ground Vehicles

4.2.1 The majority of interactions that can occur between aircraft and ground vehicles take place on apron areas. The following are some aircraft servicing operations performed on aprons that may involve attendance of ground vehicles and that should be taken into account when planning segregation of traffic on aprons:

(a) passenger unloading/loading;

(b) baggage unloading/loading;

(c) cargo and/or mail unloading/loading;

(d) galley service;

(e)   sanitation service;

(f)    fuelling service;

(g) provision of compressed air for engine starting;

(h) aircraft maintenance; and

(i)electric power and air conditioning (if not provided by aircraft auxiliary power units).

In addition, provision should be made for emergency and security vehicles on the apron areas.

4.2.2 Ground vehicle activities that occur on movement areas outside of the aprons include the following:

(a) Emergency operations. Rescue and fire fighting equipment, which may be required at any point on the aerodrome or runway approach areas.

(b) Security operations. Small vehicles used for the patrol of fence lines and restricted areas.

(c) Aerodrome maintenance and construction.

Repair of pavements, navigation aids and lighting, grass mowing, snow/ice removal operations, etc.

 

4.3 Methods to Achieve Segregation

4.3.1 Several general concepts for achieving segre­gation of traffic are presented in the following paragraphs. For apron areas in particular, the degree of segregation which can be achieved depends largely on the available space. The greater the amount of space available for a given number of aircraft stands, the easier it is to segregate types of traffic. Normally, the need for economy is such that aprons are rarely designed with excess area and, in any case, air traffic growth generally absorbs any designed spare apron area. The degree of segregation necessary is dependent on the dimensions and other characteristics of aircraft (e.g. wing span, manoeuvrability and jet blast) and the nature of the ground vehicles. In addition, when planning an aerodrome, aircraft operators should be consulted to determine their anticipated ground vehicle movement requirements.

Exclusion

4.3.2 Although the design of aerodrome facilities can ease considerably the problem of mixing of aircraft with ground vehicles, it is nevertheless most important that aircraft operators be conscious of the need to keep the volume of their ground traffic to a minimum. All ground vehicles whose function does not require them to be on the movement area should be excluded. This practice is also in accord with basic aerodrome security measures. Land side road systems should be designed so that public vehicles have access to all public areas of an aerodrome without travelling on the movement area. Measures should also be taken to prevent unauthorized access of public vehicles to the movement area. This requires the provision of fences, gates and other security systems needed to strictly control access.

 

Service roads for ground vehicles

4.3.3 Air side service roads for ground vehicles can eliminate or lessen to a great extent the necessity for the use of runways and taxiways by ground vehicles. Such roads should be planned so that at least the critical sections of the movement area for traffic congestion can be bypassed by ground vehicular traffic. For example, these roads may be used as aerodrome perimeter service roads providing access to navigation aids, as temporary roads for construction vehicles or as air side roads between terminal buildings and aprons for the passage of airline vehicles, baggage trains, etc. For terminals with passenger loading bridges, air side roads may (for some designs) pass beneath the immovable part of the loading bridge. Figure 4‑1 shows examples of air side service roads used on aprons. Some general considerations in the planning of roads are described as follows:

(a) every effort should be made to plan air side service roads so that they do not cross runways and taxiways. At high traffic aerodromes, road tunnels beneath runways and taxiways should be considered at major intersections in order to avoid such crossings;

(b) when planning the aerodrome road layout, account should be taken of the need to provide emergency access roads for use by rescue and fire fighting vehicles to various areas on the aerodrome and in particular to the approach areas up to 1 000 m from the threshold, or at least within the aerodrome boundary;

(c) service roads to navigation aids should be planned in such a manner as to present minimal inter­ference to the function of the aids. If it is necessary for an access road to cross an approach area, the road should be located so that vehicles travelling on them are not obstacles to aircraft operations; and

(d) the air side service road system must be designed to account for local security measures. Access points to the system will thus need to be restricted. Should ground vehicle movements affect surface movement of aircraft on runways and taxiways, it will be required that the ground vehicle movements be co‑ordinated by the appropriate aerodrome control. Control is normally exercised by means of two‑way radio communication, although visual signals, such as signal lamps, are adequate when the traffic at the aerodrome is light. Signs or signals may also be employed to aid control at intersections.

 

Fixed servicing installations

4.3.4 Many apron service vehicles can be eliminated with the provision of fixed servicing installations set either within the apron or within the terminal buildings adjacent to the aircraft stands. For example, the provision of hydrant fuelling systems, compressed air outlets, static power supplies, drainage outlets, drinking water hydrants, air conditioning outlets and telephone outlets close to aircraft stands would considerably reduce the equipment and vehicles required for aircraft servicing. Loading bridges for passenger loading and unloading can also be thought of as a form of fixed servicing installation as they eliminate the need for passenger loading equipment and the need for passengers to travel over the apron (either by walking or in a passenger transport vehicle). Furthermore, loading bridges generally lend themselves to the provision of fixtures for aircraft servicing operations. Some of the disadvantages of fixed servicing installations are high initial costs and limited flexibility for different aircraft types. However, if in the planning stage careful consideration is given to the location and number of these facilities, the required flexibility can be achieved. In addition, the different power supply requirements of present‑day aircraft complicate the provision of static power supplies; however, the trend in aircraft design is towards greater standardization of electrical requirements. See the Airport Planning Manual (Doc 9184), for planning considerations regarding fixed servicing installations.

 

Markings

4.3.5 Paint markings should be used to facilitate the segregation of traffic on aprons. Markings can be used to provide guidance to pilots in manoeuvring their aircraft safely and expeditiously on aprons. Other markings are used to designate safety limits for placement of equipment on aprons, e.g. wing tip clearance lines and other markings used to delineate access routes for ground vehicles, passengers or personnel across the apron. There should be a colour change between lines to distinguish one from another.