Chapter 8

Extinguishing Agent Characteristics

 

 

8.1 PRINCIPAL EXTINGUISHING AGENTS     

8.1.1 Foam. Foam used for aircraft rescue and fire fighting is primarily intended to provide an air‑excluding blanket, which prevents volatile flammable vapours from mixing with air or oxygen. To perform this function a foam must flow freely over the fuel surface, must resist disruption due to wind or exposure to heat or flame and should be capable of resealing any ruptures caused by the disturbance of an established blanket. Its water retention properties will determine its resistance to thermal exposure and will provide limited cooling to any elements of the aircraft structure to which it adheres. There are several types of foam concentrate from which effective fire fighting foams can be produced and these are described as follows:

(a) Protein foam. This consists primarily of protein hydro­ listed, plus stabilizing additives and inhibitors to       protect against freezing, to prevent corrosion of equip­ mint and containers, to resist bacterial decomposition, to control viscosity, and to otherwise ensure readiness for use under emergency conditions. Current forum­- Latinos are used at recommended nominal concern­- tractions of 3, 5 and 6 per cent by volume of the water disc 1 hare. All of these can be used to produce a suitable foam but the manufacturer of the foam‑making equip­ mint should be consulted as to the correct concentrate to be used in any particular system (the proportion installed must be properly designed and/or set for the bconcentrate being used). Foam liquids of different types or different manufacturers should not be mixed unless it is established that they are completely interchangeable and  compatible. Where a dry chemical powder is to be used as the complementary agent in conjunction with protein foam it is essential to determine the compete­ ability of these agents for simultaneous application. Incompatibility will result in the destruction of the foam blanket in areas where the two agents are in contact. To ensure that the tank does not contain stale protein foam, the entire contents should be discharged periodically and the entire system washed through.

(b)Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). There are many concentrates in this category all consisting basically of a fluorinated surfactant with foam stabilizer. The concentrates may, according to the specification, be used in solutions from 1 per cent to 6 per cent, with appropriate proportioning systems, or in pre‑mixed solutions. It is essential in selecting a concentrate to ensure that it is suitable for use in the total system incorporated in a rescue and fire fighting vehicle. It is also important to discuss with the manufacturer or supplier the use of an AFFF concentrate in extremes of temperature or where salt or brackish water may be used in the solution, with particular regard to any possibility of interaction between the tank structure, any surface treatment or the associated plumbing of the system. The foam produced acts to provide a barrier to exclude air or oxygen and, by the drainage of a chemically impregnated fluid from the foam, to provide a film on the fuel surface capable of containing fuel vapour. The foam produced does not have the density and visual appearance of foams produced from protein or fluoroprotein concentrates and training will be necessary to accustom fire fighters to its effectiveness as a fire suppressant. AFFF concentrates may be used in equipment normally used for protein or fluoroprotein foam production but conversion should not be undertaken without consultation with the manufacturer or supplier of the AFFF concentrate or rescue and fire fighting vehicle. A thorough flushing of the foam tank and the total foam‑making system will be necessary before the introduction of the AFFF concentrate. Some changes in the foam‑making systems of vehicles, particularly aspirating nozzles, where used, may be necessary to achieve the optimum properties of AFFF foams. The AFFF foams are compatible with all currently available dry chemical powder agents. Protein and fluoroprotein concentrates are incompatible with AFFF concentrates and they should not be mixed although foams produced from these concentrates, separately generated, may be applied to a fire in sequence or simultaneously.

  (c) Fluoroprotein foam (conventional). This foam contains a concentration of synthetic fluorinated surfactant giving better all around performance than ordinary protein foams, as well as providing resistance to breakdown by chemical powders. Current formulations are used at concentrations of 3 and 6 per cent by volume of the water discharge. The manufacturer of the foammaking equipment should be consulted as to the correct concentrate to be used in any particular system. (The proportioner used must be properly designed and/or set for the concentrate being used.) Foam liquids of different types or different manufacturer should not be mixed unless it is established that they are completely interchangeable and compatible. Compatibility of a foam produced by any proposed agent and system with a dry chemical powder agent is essential and should be established by a test programme although it is known that compatibility is a characteristic of most fluoroprotein foams.

(d) Film forming fluoroprotein (FFFP) foams. Film forming fluoroprotein (FFFP) agents are composed of protein together with film forming fluoronated surfactants, which make them capable of forming water solution films on the surface of flammable liquids and of adding oleophobic properties to the foam generated. This characteristic makes FFFP particularly effective where the foam may be contaminated with fuel (such as forceful application). Expanded foams generated from FFFP solutions have fast spreading characteristics and act as surface barriers to exclude air and prevent vaporization, thus suppressing combustible vapours. This film, which can spread over fuel surfaces not covered with foam, is self‑sealing following mechanical disruption and continues as long as there remains a reservoir of foam for its production. To ensure extinction, however, an FFFP blanket should cover the fuel surface, as is the practice with other foams. This foam is highly effective on fuel spills because it is fluid, film forming and has oleo phobic properties. Film forming fluoroprotein concentrates are available for proportioning to a final concentration of 3 to 6 per cent by volume using either fresh or sea water. They are compatible with dry chemical agents but this should be confirmed by a test programme.

(e) Synthetic foams. This foam contains primarily petroleum products ‑ alkyl sulphates, alkylsulphanates, alkylarylsulphanates, etc. Synthetic foam forming substances also include stabilizers, anti‑corrosives, and components to control viscosity, freezing temperature and bacteriological decomposition. Concentrates of different types or from different manufacturers should not be mixed in order to obtain extinguishing foam;

       however, synthetic foams from different pieces of equipment are compatible and can be used one after the other or simultaneously to extinguish a fire. The degree of compatibility between synthetic foams and dry (powder) chemical substances should be determined prior to their intended use.

 

8.1.2 Methods of foam production. Foam produced by most vehicles to be used for aircraft rescue and fire fighting will utilize solutions, either in pre‑mixed forms or by the use of a proportioning system, which are delivered at a predetermined pressure to nozzles which induce air to aspirate the solution. The pressure may be created by a pump or, with vehicles of smaller capacity, by a compressed gas source, usually either dry nitrogen or dry air. In all cases the system will produce acceptable foam only if the solution is delivered in the appropriate volume and in the correct pressure range to the aspirating nozzle or nozzles. The operational advantage of aspirating nozzles lies in their ability to produce foams of acceptable quality both at the vehicle monitor and, where necessary, through extended hose‑lines, provided that the pressure is adjusted to compensate for any friction and contour losses contributed by the hose‑lines. This type of installation has largely displaced earlier systems in which foam was produced within the vehicle and distributed through nozzles. Aspiration of the solution within these systems was by the induction or injection of air, by various methods, all of which produced an effective foam. The disadvantages of these systems were that they utilized large (10 cm) diameter hose to convey the foam through sidelines, and that there was a progressive pressure loss in extended hose‑lines, resulting in an inadequate range of application at distances of over 40 m from the vehicle. It is for these reasons that most modern aircraft fire fighting vehicles employ foam‑making systems based on the aspiration of solutions at the nozzle.

 

8.1.3 Quality of foams. The quality of foam produced by a rescue and fire-fighting vehicle using any of the concentrate‑types described in 8.1.1 will significantly affect the control and extinguishment times of an aircraft fire. Functional fire tests are required to determine the suitability of a foam concentrate in an airport environment. Paragraph 8.1.5 below lists the minimum specifications for foams produced from protein, synthetic, fluoroprotein, film forming fluoroprotein and aqueous film forming concentrates. The specifications include physical properties and the performance of the foams under fire test conditions. Any foam concentrate to be used in aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicles should meet or exceed the criteria in these specifications, so as to achieve the performance level A or B, as appropriate. Further, to avail for a reduction in the amounts of water for foam production (see Table 2‑2), the foam concentrate should achieve the performance level B.

 

8.1.4 Where States or individual users do not have the facilities for conducting the tests which will establish the specified properties and performances, certification of the qualification of a concentrate should be obtained from the manufacturer or supplier, based on the local operating conditions.

 

8.1.5 Foam specifications (See Table 8‑1)

pH value. pH value is a measurement to express the acidity or alkaline properties of a liquid. Therefore, in order to prevent the corrosion of plumbing or the foam tanks of a rescue and fire fighting vehicle, the foam concentrate should be as neutral as possible and should register between the values of 6 and 8.5.

 

Viscosity. The viscosity of a foam concentrate is an indication of the resistance to flow of the liquid in the plumbing of a rescue and fire fighting vehicle, and its consequential entry into the water system. The viscosity measurement of a foam concentrate when at its lowest temperature should not exceed 200 mm/s. Any higher registration will restrict flow and retard its adequate blending into the water stream unless special precautions are taken.

 

Sedimentation. Sediment may form in foam which contains impurities or if it is subjected to adverse storage, severe weather conditions and/or varying temperatures. The resultant creation of sediment may affect the performance of a vehicle's foam proportioning system or negate its fire fighting efficiency. When tested by the centrifuge method, foams should contain no greater than 0.5 per cent of sediment.

 

Fire test method

Objective: To evaluate the ability of a foam concentrate to:

(a)  extinguish a fire of 2.8 m2 or 4.5 M2, as appropriate;

(b) resist burn back due to exposure to fuel and heat.

Equipment:

(a)  A circular fire steel tray of 2.8 M2 or 4. 5 M2. The vertical wall shall be 200 mm;

(b) Equipment or access to facilities to enable accurate recordings of:

1)  air temperature

2)  water temperature; and

3)  wind velocity;

 

 

 

 

 

Table 8‑1

 

                                                                                

Fire tests

Performance

level A

Performance

level B

1. Nozzle (air aspirated)

 

 

 

a) Branch pipe

"UNI 86

foam nozzle

(See Appendix 3)

"UNI 86

foam nozzle

(See Appendix 3)

b) Nozzle pressure

700 kPa

700 kPa

c) Application rate

4.1 L/min/m²

2.5 L/ min / m²

d) Discharge rate

11.4 Umin

11.4 Urnin

2. Fire size

2.8 M²

(circular)

4.5 M²

 

(circular)

3. Fuel (on water substrate)

 

Kerosene

Kerosene

4. Preburn time

60 s

60 s

5. Fire performance

 

 

 

a) extinguishing time

<60 s

<60 s

b) total application time

120 s

120 s

c) 25 %reignition time

5 min

5 min

 

(c) Fuel: 100 L of Avtur (Jet A) for performance level B tests; 60 L of Avtur (Jet A) for performance level A tests;

(d) Branch pipe, straight stream, air aspirating nozzle;

(e) Suitable stop watch; and

(f) Circular, burn back pot, measuring 300 mm (internal diameter), 200 mm high, 2 L of gasoline or kerosene. 

 

Preferable conditions:

a) Air temperature (°C)                                               ≥ 15

b) Foam solution temperature (°C)                                     15

c) Wind velocity (m/s)                                                    ≤ 3

 

Test procedure

- Position the chamber holding the premix foam upwind of the fire with the nozzle           horizontal at a height of 1 m above the upper edge of the tray and at a distance that will ensure that the foam will fall into the centre of the tray. The branch pipe may be moved on a horizontal plane during the test.

- Test the foam apparatus to ensure:

a)      nozzle pressure; and

b)      discharge rate.

-  When testing performance level B foam, place 100 L of water and 100 L of fuel into a 4.5         M² tray. When testing performance level A foam, place 60 L of water and 60 L of fuel into a 2.8 M² tray.

-Ignite fuel and allow 60 seconds preburn from full involvement.

-Apply foam continuously while maintaining a nozzle pressure of 700 kPa for 120 seconds.

-Record extinction time.

-Place burn back pot in centre of fire tray.

-Ignite burn back pot 120 seconds after end of application of foam.

-Record when 25 per cent of the fuel area is re‑involved with fire.

 

8.1.6 Operational considerations. The quality of foam produced by a vehicle system may be affected by the characteristics of the local water supply. Adjustments to the solution strength may be necessary in certain situations to achieve optimum foam quality. No corrosion inhibitors, freezing point depressants or other additives should be used in the water supply without prior consultation with, and the approval of, the foam concentrate manufacturer.

 

8.1.7 Foam can be applied to fires in two distinct forms. Solid streams are used where range of application is essential or where the stream may be deflected from a solid object to distribute it in the fire area. Solid streams must be employed with care at an aircraft accident where survivors are evacuating the aircraft and escape slides may be in use. Dispersed patterns may be employed to deliver foam at shorter ranges to a fire area, combining greater coverage with the more effective surface application of the foam. Dispersed patterns are particularly valuable in protecting fire fighters from radiated heat. In some vehicles standard water nozzles are employed to produce "fogfoam", mainly from sideline deliveries. While these nozzles are effective in achieving rapid knockdown they do not produce foams of the specified qualities and these may not have the degree of permanence associated with fully aspirated foams.

 

8.2 COMPLEMENTARY AGENTS

8.2.1 Complementary agents do not generally have any substantial cooling effect on liquids or materials involved in fire. In a major fire situation extinguishment achieved by complementary agents may well only be transient and danger of ‑flashback‑ or reignition may occur when foam is not available to secure a fire. They are particularly effective on concealed fires (e.g. engine fires) in aircraft freight holds and beneath wings, where foams may not penetrate and on running fuel fire situations, on which foams are ineffective. They are known as complementary agents because while they may have the capability of rapid fire suppression (when applied at a sufficient rate), it is generally necessary to apply a principal agent simultaneously or at least before flashback can occur in order to achieve permanent control. Considerably improved complementary agents have become available in recent years, and constant studies are still being made in both the dry chemical and halocarbon fields.

 

8.2.2 Due regard must be made to the problems which may arise when large quantities of complementary agents are discharged rapidly. A dense cloud of the agent may impede aircraft evacuation or rescue operations by limiting the visibility and affecting the respiration of those exposed to the effects.

 

8.2.3 Replacement of water for foam production by complementary agents. Paragraph 2.3.1 defines conditions in which water for foam production may be replaced by complementary agents. Paragraph 2.3.8 provides the substitution ratios for each of the complementary agents in these calculations.

 

8.2.4 Dry chemical powders. These are available in a number of formulations, each consisting of finely divided chemical products which are combined with additives to improve their performance. The dry chemical powders normally provided for aircraft rescue and fire fighting applications are not specifically designed or intended for use on flammable metal fires, which require specialized agents (see 12.2.17). In aircraft rescue and fire fighting operations dry chemical powders are normally of the "BC" type, indicating their effectiveness against fires involving flammable liquids and those of an electrical origin. Operational applications are usually in one of the following ways:

(a)  as a medium when fires are in an incipient stage, particularly fires involving undercarriage assemblies. They are also effective against fires in concealed or inaccessible locations and for running fuel fires, where foams are largely ineffective;

(b) at a high rate of application in the role of a principal agent, which may well be an acceptable practice at airports with extreme climatic conditions. Details of the equivalents for the substitution of dry chemical for water for foam production may be found in 2.3.8. In addition to the problems described in 8.2.2, when large quantities of dry chemical powders are discharged rapidly limited visibility will also reduce the effective placement of foam in a dual‑agent attack to those areas where the dry chemical powder has achieved "knockdown".

 

8.2.5 As with all complementary agents, the successful use of dry chemical powders is strongly dependent on the technique of its application. When used with foam in dual agent attack it can provide rapid knockdown of flammable liquid fires and some protection to operatives from radiated heat when delivered at suitable rates. Rates of 3 kg/s are about the limit for handline operatives in fireground conditions but much higher discharge rates are available when dry chemical powder monitors are provided. Operatives must appreciate the limited cooling effect of dry chemical powders, which means that liquid fuel fires may be extinguished without any corresponding reduction in the temperature of metal components in the fire area. Reignition will be a constant hazard in these circumstances. The application of dry chemical powders is also significantly affected by wind speed but use may be made of the wind to augment the range of a powder stream and to influence its pattern of distribution. Any dry chemical powder intended for use in a dual‑agent attack with a foam must be tested for its compatibility with that foam. (See also 8.1.1.) In addition, dry chemical powders should comply with the specifications of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 7202).

 

8.2.6 Halogenated hydrocarbons. These agents, also known as halons, have been available as fire extinguishing agents for many years but the early compounds produced vapours which had unacceptable levels of toxicity, either in their natural state or after exposure to heat. More recent products have more acceptable toxicity factors and have gained wide acceptance in aircraft rescue and fire fighting applications. The agents have complex chemical names and to simplify references to them a "numbering system" was devised by the United States Corps of Engineers. The figures, from left to right, represent the numbers of carbon, fluorine, chlorine and bromine atoms in the described compound. Thus a compound having the chemical name of bromochlorodifluoromethane, and the formula CF2 Cl Br, is known as Halon 1211. Similarly, bromotrifluoromethane, CF, Br, is known as Halon 1301. These two agents are currently in use in fire fighting systems but differences in their physical properties have tended to direct them into fields where these characteristics can be directed to produce maximum operational advantages with the minimum of installation problems.

 

8.2.7 Halogenated hydrocarbons should comply with the specifications of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 7201). Halon 1211, with its lower vapour pressure, 230 kPa at 2WC, can be contained in lighter pressure vessels than Halon 1301, which has a vapour pressure of 1 430 kPa at 2WC. The higher boiling point of Halon 1211 (‑4°C) ensures that more of the discharge from a system reaches the fire in liquid droplets than would be the case with Halon 1301, which boils at ‑ 57°C. Both of these factors have led to the adoption of Halon 1211 in vehicle installations, with adequate ranges of agent projection, intended to deal with fires occurring in the open. In these circumstances the slightly higher toxicity rating of Halon 1211 is of no significance as the levels of concentration where an exposure hazard may be created are never reached.

 

8.2.8 For the fire protection of delicate equipment within buildings, where toxicity factors may be more significant due to the size of the protected compartment, Halon 1301 installations are more frequently the choice, due to the acceptability of slightly higher concentrations of this agent. Range of application and total system weight are of less consequence in these installations.

 

8.2.9 Halon installations on aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicles consist of one or more pressure vessels, in individual capacities from 25 kg to 150 kg. Where Halon 1211 is provided the agent is pressurized to around 1 500 kPa, usually by nitrogen, and the system delivers the agent through a hose‑line and special applicator at up to 2 kg/s. This gives a throw of about 10 m although newtype applicators can also provide a diffused pattern of discharge over a range of 3 m, but with a wider distribution of the agent to deal with larger ground fire areas. The action of the discharged Halon 1211, with some liquid particles reaching the fire area, provides a degree of permanence as the liquid element vapourizes and continues the fire suppression process in the area.

 

8.2.10 Operators must be trained to deliver halon agents in a series of brief discharges, interspersed with observations of the degree of fire control achieved. Use may be made of wind‑effect to increase range of application and where a jet/spray applicator is available, transition to the spray pattern should be made as the operator is able to close with the fire. These tactics are particularly important in dealing with fire situations involving aircraft undercarriage assemblies. (See 12.2.3)

 

8.2.11 The availability of equipment to permit the recharging of the pressure vessels containing Halon 1211 at the airport of use has greatly eased the operational management problems associated with the early installations. The total equipment requirement consists of a bulk supply of the agent, a cylinder of compressed nitrogen and a filling rig, usually in a container. The filling rig consists of a series of flexible pipes to deliver the halon and its expellant to the pressure vessel, pressure gauges to ensure correct pressurization, a safety valve to protect all equipment and the operatives and a range of adaptors to accommodate pressure vessels in sizes from those of portable extinguishers to the larger units on trolleys or vehicles. Personnel appointed to perform refilling operations will require only minimal initial training to ensure the correct sequence of operations and the observation of safety precautions.

 

8.2.12 Carbon dioxide (C02). Carbon dioxide is traditionally used in aircraft rescue and fire fighting operations in two ways:

(a)  as a means of rapid knockdown for small fires or as a flooding agent in reaching concealed fires in areas inaccessible to foam. It should not be used on fires involving flammable metals; and

(b) as the complementary agent in a dual‑agent attack with a foam. In this form of application the C02 is most

effective at high rates of delivery, achieved through ‑‑‑lowpressure" systems.

 

8.2.13 Carbon dioxide installations in aircraft rescue and fire fighting vehicles were originally of two types:

(a)  "high pressure" systems, consisting of a series of cylinders, manifolded together, containing C02 gas at 5 900 kPa pressure at an ambient temperature of 21º C; and

(b)  "low pressure‑ systems, where the carbon dioxide is contained in an insulated pressure vessel at a controlled low temperature, usually ‑ 18ºC. At this temperature the storage pressure is 2 100 kPa and the delivery systems can provide discharge rates up to 1 100 kg/min, giving a long throw to a great volume of gas. Equipment of this type is not now in regular production.

 

8.2.14 CO2, gas is only 1.5 times the weight of air and is therefore seriously affected in outdoor applications by the wind and the convection currents associated with a fire. The availability of alternative complementary agents has provided the opportunity for the replacement of CO2, gas in vehicle installations.

 

8.2.15 Carbon dioxide should comply with the specifications of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 5923).

 

            

 

 8.3 CONDITIONS OF STORAGE OF EXTINGUISHING AGENTS

Paragraph 2.6.1 proposes that a reserve supply of foam concentrate and complementary agents should be maintained on the airport, equivalent to 200 per cent of the quantities carried in the vehicles. Paragraph 9.3.5 suggests that this reserve of agents shall be stored in the fire station(s). The conditions of storage are frequently specified by manufacturers or suppliers but in general terms the aim should be:

(a) foam concentrate. Avoid extremes of temperature. Use stocks in order of receipt. Keep concentrate in manufacturers' containers until required for use. Replace and seal the caps of any partly‑used containers;

(b) dry chemical powders. Use stocks in order of receipt. Replace and seal the caps of any partly‑used containers; and

(c)  halogenated hydro7carbon agents. Avoid direct exposure to sunlight and high temperatures, even where pressure vessels are filled to tropical levels. Use pressure‑relief valve, where fitted, to reduce overpressure in accordance with manufacturers' instructions.