1.1
The threshold is normally located at the extremity of a runway, if there are no
obstacles penetrating above the approach surface. In some
cases, however, due to local conditions it may be desirable to displace the threshold
permanently (see below). When studying the location of a threshold, consideration
should also be given to the height of the ILS reference datum
and/or MLS approach reference datum and the determination of the
obstacle clearance limits. (Specifications concerning the height of the ILS
reference datum and MLS approach reference datum are given in ECAR Part
171).
2
Displaced threshold
2.1
If an object extends above the approach surface and the object cannot be
removed, consideration should be given to displacing the threshold permanently.
2.2
To meet the obstacle limitation objectives of Subpart G of
ECAR Part 139,
the threshold should ideally be displaced down the runway for the distance
necessary to provide that the approach surface is cleared of obstacles.
2.3
However, displacement of the threshold from the runway extremity will
inevitably cause reduction of the landing distance available, and this may be
of greater oper-ational significance than penetration of the approach surface
by marked and lighted obstacles. A decision to displace the threshold, and the
extent of such displacement, should therefore have regard to an optimum balance
between the considerations of clear approach surfaces and adequate landing
distance. In deciding this question, account will need to be taken of the types
of aeroplanes which the runway is intended to serve, the limiting visibility
and cloud base conditions under which the runway will be used, the position of
the obstacles in relation to the threshold and extended centre line and, in the
case of a precision approach runway, the significance of the obstacles to the
determination of the obstacle clearance limit.
2.4
Notwithstanding the consideration of landing distance available, the selected
position for the threshold should not be such that the obstacle-free surface to
the thresh-old is steeper than 3.3 per cent where the code number is 4 or
steeper than 5 per cent where the code number is 3.
2.6
Depending on the length of
the displacement, the RVR at the threshold could differ from that at the
beginning of the runway for take-offs. The use of red runway edge lights with
photometric intensities lower than the nominal value of 10 000 cd for white
lights increases that phenomenon. The impact of a displaced threshold on
take-off minima should be assessed by the aerodrome operator.
2.7 Provisions in ECAR 139,
regarding marking and lighting of displaced thresholds and some operational
recommendations can be found in paragraphs 139.321.(d).9 and 10, 139.323.(e).5,
139.323.(h).1, 139.323.(i).7, 139.323.(j).3 and 7, and 139.323.(l).6.